Skip to main content

2.0

EO 14287 § 5 directs the AG and DHS to block enforcement of state and local laws providing benefits to undocumented individuals (including in-state tuition)

  1. Original Date Announced

    April 28, 2025

    Sec. 5 of EO 14287, "Protecting American Communities From Criminal Aliens," states that the Attorney General (AG) and the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) shall "take appropriate action to stop the enforcement of State and local laws, regulations, policies, and practices favoring aliens over any groups of American citizens. . ." This includes state laws that provide in-state higher education tuition to undocumented individuals but not to out-of-state American citizens that may violate 8 U.S.C. 1623 and those that deal with sentencing.

    Trump 2.0 [ID #1719]

    2025.04.28 EO 14287: Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens
  2. Effective Date

    April 28, 2025
  3. Subsequent Trump and Court Action(s)

    • June 4, 2025

      2025.06.04 Complaint – United States v. Texas

      The United States filed a lawsuit against the State of Texas challenging §§ 54.051(m) and 54.052(a) of the Texas Education Code, which allow certain undocumented immigrants to qualify for in-state tuition at public colleges and universities. The complaint alleges that these provisions are preempted by federal law, specifically 8 U.S.C. § 1623(a), which prohibits states from providing postsecondary education benefits to undocumented individuals unless the same benefits are available to U.S. citizens regardless of residency. The United States argues that the Texas provisions violate the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief. United States v. Texas, No. 7:25-cv-00055 (N.D. Tex.).

      Litigation entries are limited to initial complaints and major substantive rulings. For pleadings and additional information, use name and docket number to search Civil Rights Clearinghouse and CourtListener or visit Just Security Litigation Tracker.

      View Document
    • June 4, 2025

      2025.06.04 Final Consent Judgment – United States v. Texas

      After Texas agreed not to defend its in-state tuition law, Judge Reed O'Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas entered a final consent judgment declaring that Texas Education Code §§ 54.051(m) and 54.052(a), as applied to noncitizens who are not lawfully present in the United States, violate the Supremacy Clause and are unconstitutional and invalid. The court permanently enjoined Texas and its agents from enforcing the challenged provisions.

      The judgment followed a joint motion for entry of consent judgment by the United States and the State of Texas and resolved the federal government’s lawsuit asserting that the Texas statutes were preempted by 8 U.S.C. § 1623.

      The same-day filing of the Complaint, Joint Motion, and entry of a Consent Judgment raises questions of collusion, according to legal experts.

      United States v. Texas, No. 7:25-cv-00055 (N.D. Tex.).

      *See litigation note above*

      View Document

Current Status

None

Original Trump Policy Status

Status: Final/Actual
Trump Administration Action: Presidential Orders
Subject Matter: Sanctuary Restrictions
Agencies Affected: DHS AG

Associated or Derivative Policies

To provide information, corrections, or feedback, please email IPTP.feedback@gmail.com

To provide information, corrections, or feedback, please email IPTP.feedback@gmail.com