-
Original Date Announced
May 12, 2025ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons issued a memorandum to All ICE Personnel, "Utilizing Form I-205, Warrant of Removal," authorizing all ICE special agents and deportation officers to execute Forms I-210 (administrative warrants) without more to arrest noncitizens subject to final removal orders in their residences. The memo refers to a recent determination by the DHS Office of the General Counsel that nothing in the U.S. Constitution, the INA, or immigration regulations prohibits relying on administrative warrants for this purpose. The memo specifically authorizes ICE personnel to use force to enter a residence after knocking and announcing their presence and providing a reasonable opportunity to open the door.
ICE basic training provides to the contrary that "a warrant of removal/deportation does NOT alone authorize a 4th amendment search of any kind" (original emphasis).
The memorandum was produced as part of a whistleblower complaint to Congress.
Trump 2.0 [ID# 2175]
2025.05.12 Utilizing Form I-205 Warrant of Removal - ICEEffective Date
May 12, 2025Subsequent Trump and Court Action
January 23, 20262026.01.23 Reported: ICE has been entering homes without judicial warrants since last summer, sources say - NBC News
NBC News reports that ICE began forcibly entering homes without judicial warrants in the summer of 2025, relying on administrative warrants signed by ICE officials to arrest people with final removal orders.
View DocumentSubsequent Trump and Court Action
January 30, 20262026.01.30 Complaint - Greater Boston Latino Network v. Noem
The Greater Boston Latino Network (GBLN) and the Brazilian Worker Center (BWC) sued DHS Secretary Noem and Acting ICE Director Todd M. Lyons. The complaint challenges the May 2025 memo authorizing ICE officers to enter private residences using administrative warrants (Form I-205). Previously, such administrative warrants were not considered sufficient to authorize nonconsensual entries for immigration arrests without a judicial warrant. Plaintiffs allege this policy violates the Fourth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), asserting it was implemented without the required notice-and-comment rulemaking process and lacks a reasoned legal basis. The lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment to vacate the memo and a permanent injunction of its further implementation. Greater Boston Latino Network v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-10472 (D. Mass.).
**Link to case here. Our litigation entries generally report only the initial complaint and any major substantive filings or decisions. For additional information, CourtListener provides access to PACER and all available pleadings. Other sites that track litigation in more detail or organize cases by topic include Civil Rights Clearinghouse, Justice Action Center, National Immigration Litigation Alliance, and Just Security**
View DocumentCurrent Status
NoneOriginal Trump Policy Status
Status: Final/ActualTrump Administration Actions: Agency Directive Change in PracticeSubject Matter: InteriorAgencies Affected: ICEAssociated or Derivative Policies
- January 20, 2025 EO 14159: "Protecting the American People Against Invasion"
- January 26, 2025 Reported: Trump administration officials direct ICE to increase arrests to meet daily quotas
- December 4, 2025 DHS launches Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota
Pre Trump-Era Policies
-
June 14, 2007
Letter from then-DHS Secretary Chertoff to Senator Dodd explaining that "[a] warrant of removal is administrative in nature and does not grant the same authority to enter dwellings as a judicially approved search or arrest warrant."
2007.06.14 Secretary Chertoff letter re Administrative Warrants -
July 26, 2021
ICE basic training (2021) provides that "a warrant of removal/deportation does NOT alone authorize a 4th amendment search of any kind."
2021.07.26 ICE ERO 4th Amendment Training
Documents
Trump-Era Policy Documents
-
New Policy
Original Source:
2025.05.12 Utilizing Form I205 Warrant of Removal - ICE
-
Prior Policy
-
Prior Policy
Original Source:
2021.07.26 ICE ERO 4th Amendment Training
-
Subsequent Action
Original Source:
Complaint - Greater Boston Latino Network v. Noem
To provide information, corrections, or feedback, please email IPTP.feedback@gmail.com
Commentary
2026.01.21 AP - Immigration officers assert sweeping power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant, memo says
AP reports on the whistleblower complaint that revealed the ICE memo described in this entry as well as ICE's 2021 basic training guidance on Fourth Amendment prohibitions against searches conducted pursuant to an administrative warrant. The memo provides context to recent reports, including an incident where federal agents “ramm[ed] through the front door of the home of a Liberian man, … with a deportation order from 2023.” Documents reviewed by the AP revealed that the agents only had an administrative warrant.
Go to article2026.01.22 Wall Street Journal - How the Deep State Thwarted ICE Administrative Warrants
Jimmy Percival, DHS General Counsel, defends in the Wall Street Journal using administrative warrants to enter residences in search of undocumented immigrants. He argues that undocumented immigrants are not entitled to the same Fourth Amendment protections as U.S. citizens, citing cases that purportedly recognize the propriety of administrative arrests for "deportable aliens."
Go to article2026.1.22 The Volokh Conspiracy - Can ICE Enter a Home To Make an Arrest With Only an Administrative Warrant?
Professor Orin Kerr, an expert on Fourth Amendment law, writes that "the DHS policy [authorizing entry based on an administrative warrant] is likely wrong," noting that Supreme Court precedent has "settled the idea that a warrant requires a neutral and detached magistrate" and that "a judicial warrant is needed for entry." However, he writes that "the DHS position is not frivolous in light of" a 2021 district court decision endorsing entry on the basis of an administrative warrant that was affirmed by the Fifth Circuit on other grounds. Professor Kerr notes that "the trickier issue may be actually getting a merits ruling in light of the absence of remedies due to the Supreme Court's gradual cutting back on Bivens remedies."
Go to article2026.02.02 New York Times - We Were Top Homeland Security Lawyers. You Can’t Wish Away the Fourth Amendment.
Six former DHS general counsels published a response to Percival’s defense. They argue that the Fourth Amendment, which has long protected the “sanctity of the home,” prohibits ICE from entering homes using administrative warrants. They critique Percival’s justifications and argue that using administrative warrants for forcible entry runs counter to years of practice, precedent, and training.
Go to article