The State Department updates guidelines for adjudicating blanket L visa applications, reminding consular officers that blanket L visa applicants must demonstrate eligibility by “clear and convincing evidence" and applications should be denied if eligiblity questions cannot be quickly and easily resolved at interview. [ID #570]
August 9, 2017
Blanket L applications at U.S. consulates have long been subject to a higher legal standard of review than L visa petitions at USCIS. Under longstanding guidelines, blanket L-1 visa applicants must demonstrate that their applications are “clearly approvable,” while USCIS petitions are subject to a less stringent “preponderance of the evidence” standard. The State Department’s new guidelines do not alter the clearly approvable standard, but the new and detailed instructions to officers could result in more frequent application denials.
9 FAM 402.12 - Intracompany Transferees - L Visas
Register if you don't have a user name and password.
Reflects degree to which the Trump-era policy remains in effect today.
Trump-era policies that have not been altered or eliminated.
Policies that have not been fully eliminated but are not in effect in their original substance. They may have been amended, updated with changes, or eliminated or enjoined in some jurisdictions or with respect to some affected parties but not others.
Policies that have expired or been fully rescinded, replaced, enjoined, etc., or that were proposed but never were finalized.
Indicates the entity that caused the action reflected in Type of Action. "Others" may include the Trump administration, Congress, unions, etc.--i.e., any actor other than the courts or the Biden Administration.
Indicates the process or action by which a policy ceased to be in effect or became partially in effect. If no such action or process has take place, or if the policy has been ratified, it is fully in effect.