Subsequent Trump-Era and Court Action(s)

• May 10, 2019

  DHS Agrees to Temporarily Continue TPS Status for Nepal and Honduras

  Pursuant to an order to stay proceedings in Bhattarai v. Nielsen, No. 19–cv–00731, pending resolution of related claims being litigated before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Ramos v. Nielsen, No. 18–16981, DHS published a notice that it will not implement or enforce the decision to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Honduras or Nepal. Beneficiaries under the TPS designations for Nepal and Honduras will retain their TPS, provided that an individual’s TPS status is not withdrawn because of ineligibility. DHS is extending the validity of TPS-related documentation for Nepalese beneficiaries through March 24, 2020. The TPS designation for Honduras, signed by Acting Secretary McAleenan, remains in effect through January 5, 2020.
  
  **Litigation is listed for informational purposes and is not comprehensive. For the current status of legal challenges, check other sources.**

  View Document
• November 4, 2019

  Continuation of Documentation for Beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status Designations for El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Nepal, Nicaragua, and Sudan

  To comply with the preliminary injunctions issued in Ramos v. Nielsen and Saget v. Trump and the order to stay proceedings in Bhattarai v. Nielsen, DHS announced the continuation of documentation for beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations for El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Nepal, Nicaragua, and Sudan. The Federal Register notice was signed by Acting Secretary McAleenan. TPS-related documentation will remain in effect through January 4, 2021.

  View Document
• September 14, 2020

  Ninth Circuit Ramos Decision

  In Bhattarai v. Nielsen, affected foreign nationals challenged DHS’s termination of TPS designations for Nepal and Honduras. The Bhattarai case was stayed pending resolution of the Ramos v. Nielsen appeal at the Ninth Circuit. On September 14, 2020, the Ninth Circuit reversed the Ramos district court's ruling and vacated its preliminary injunction, but the Ninth Circuit never issued its mandate because the parties entered into extended mediation while a petition for rehearing en banc was pending before the panel. As the court-order stay of proceedings in Bhattarai was tied to the Ramos injunction, the terminations of TPS for Nepal and Honduras will not take effect while the Ramos injunction remains in place.

  **Litigation is listed for informational purposes and is not comprehensive. For the current status of legal challenges, check other sources.**

  View Document
• December 9, 2020

  Continuation of Documentation for Beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status Designations for El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, Sudan, Honduras, and Nepal

  DHS publishes notice in the Federal Register that it "is automatically extending the validity of TPS-related documentation for beneficiaries under the TPS designations for El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, Sudan, Honduras, and Nepal" through October 4, 2021. The extension is granted in light of ongoing litigation in Ramos, Bhattarai, and Saget.

  **Litigation is listed for informational purposes and is not comprehensive. For the current status of legal challenges, check other sources.**

  View Document
• February 10, 2023

  9th Cir. Order dated 2.10.23, Ramos v. Wolf

  On February 10, 2023, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a petition for rehearing en banc in Ramos v. Mayorkas, which was brought by a group of TPS holders from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan, and their U.S.-citizen children. In the order granting rehearing, the Court vacated a 2020 decision issued by a three-judge panel in the Ninth Circuit, which reversed a district court injunction of the Trump administration's decisions to terminate TPS for individuals from those four countries.

  Because the court-ordered stay of proceedings in Bhattarai is tied to the outcome of the appeal of the preliminary injunction in Ramos, the en banc court's vacatur of the panel decision vacating the Ramos preliminary injunction preserves the status quo for Honduran and Nepalese TPS holders protected by the Bhattarai stay.

  View Document
• June 29, 2023

  Order Granting DHS Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal

  On June 29, 2023, an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted DHS's motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal of the district court order in the Ramos litigation. The court's order was based on DHS's decision to newly designate TPS for Haiti and Sudan and to reconsider and rescind the prior administration's challenged decisions to terminate TPS determinations for El Salvador, Honduras, Nepal, and Nicaragua.

  **Litigation is listed for informational purposes and is not comprehensive. For the current status of legal challenges, check other sources.**

  View Document
• August 2, 2023

  2023.08.02 - Bhattarai Order Consolidating Case with Ramos

  On August 2, 2023, Judge Edward Chen in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California consolidated the Bhattarai litigation with the Ramos v. Mayorkas case. The plaintiffs in Bhattarai are TPS holders from Honduras and Nepal, while the plaintiffs in Ramos are TPS holders from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan and their U.S. citizen children.

  **Litigation is listed for informational purposes and is not comprehensive. For the current status of legal challenges, check other sources.**

  View Document
• December 28, 2023

  2023.12.28 Ramos v. Nielsen_Dist. Court Order Granting DHS' Motion to Dismiss

  On December 28, 2023, Judge Edward Chen in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted DHS' motion to dismiss the Ramos lawsuit, finding the Plaintiffs' claims were moot due to the Biden administration's rescission of the Trump-era TPS terminations and extended TPS designations for El Salvador, Honduras, Nepal, and Nicaragua, as well as the redesignation of Sudan and Haiti for TPS. Ramos v. Nielsen, No. 18-CV-01554-EMC, 2023 WL 9002731 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2023). The decision came after the Ninth Circuit dismissed DHS' appeal of the preliminary injunction issued by Judge Chen in 2018. See Ramos v. Mayorkas, No. 18-16981, 2023 WL 4363667 (9th Cir. June 29, 2023).

  **Litigation is listed for informational purposes and is not comprehensive. For the current status of legal challenges, check other sources.**

  View Document
• February 27, 2024

  2024.02.27 Ramos v. Nielsen_Judgment

  On February 27, 2024, Judge Edward Chen in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California enters judgment in favor of DHS in Ramos v. Nielsen after granting DHS' motion to dismiss on December 28, 2023.

  **Litigation is listed for informational purposes and is not comprehensive. For the current status of legal challenges, check other sources.**

  View Document