Original Date AnnouncedDecember 4, 2020
Through Policy Memo 21-06, the EOIR Director rescinds OPPM 00-01 (Asylum Request Processing) and OPPM 13-02 (The Asylum Clock), but claims to retain their core principles. The memo:
- Directs courts not to accept an affirmative asylum application referred by USCIS unless it contains all the supporting documents.
- Reiterates that defensive asylum applications need no longer be filed in person during a hearing, but also stresses new rules regarding the filing of incomplete applications.
- Reiterates the new rules for adjudicating asylum claims within 180 days and directing immigration judges to stop the asylum clock only when there are exceptional circumstances. It also discusses the circumstances under which the clock stops permanently (an untimely filed application with no applicable exception to the deadline, a withdrawn application, an application IJ deems abandoned, and an application IJ grants or denies).
- States that EOIR "houses" the employment authorization (EAD) clock for the convenience of USCIS and does so through adjournment codes. The memo expressly prohibits judges from inquiring whether the respondent wants an expedited hearing date for purposes of the EAD clock.
- Directs IJs to identify clearly the exceptional circumstances that warrant continuing an asylum case, reinforcing that "intentional or repeated negligent use of an incorrect code" may result in "corrective action" for the judge.
- Observes that the regulations do not require an IJ to postpone a case where the respondent has failed to provide biometrics or biographical information, even if respondent demonstrates good cause.
- Restates the rules for proper NTA filings by USCIS.
- Discusses IJ requests for Department of State comments on individual cases.
- States that the filing of an I-589 application for withholding of removal or CAT relief, but not asylum, will start neither the asylum clock nor the EAD clock.
- Specifies that the asylum clock does not run after the judge enters a decision on the application. It does not run while the case is on appeal before the BIA, nor if the case is remanded by the BIA.
[ID #1226]PM 21-06: Asylum Processing
Effective DateDecember 4, 2020
Subsequent Trump-Era and Court Action(s)
June 9, 2022
Garcia Perez Complaint
Putative nationwide class action brought by the National Immigration Litigation Alliance (NILA) and Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP) challenging policies and practices of USCIS and EOIR that prevent asylum seekers from obtaining work authorization. The lawsuit challenges EOIR’s and USCIS’ failure to provide adequate notice of adverse “asylum EAD clock” determinations or a viable mechanism to challenge these determinations as well as clock stoppages when an asylum applicant wins their case on appeal, files a change of venue, or when an unaccompanied child is waiting for USCIS to adjudicate their asylum application in the first instance.
**Litigation is listed for informational purposes and is not comprehensive. For the current status of legal challenges, check other sources.**View Document
Biden Administration Action: Revoked/ReplacedApril 18, 2022
2022.04.18 EOIR DM 22-05.pdf
On April 18, 2022, EOIR Director David Neal issued a Director's Memorandum rescinding the Trump-era memo mentioned in this entry.View Document
Current StatusNot in effect
Most Recent ActionApril 18, 2022 Action: Revoked/Replaced 2022.04.18 EOIR DM 22-05.pdfApril 18, 2022
Acted on by Biden Administration